X-post: Incident Response Team: Call for Nominations

X-comment from +make.wordpress.org/project: Comment on Incident Response Team: Call for Nominations

January Stats for the WordPress Photo Directory

2024 is starting off strong for the Photo Directory!

Our goal is to moderate photos as quickly as we can. And with our bigger team, we’ve been working through photos even faster. Please do remember we are all volunteers and work through the list as we are able to in the event there is a backlog. (And during photo events like WordPress Photo Festival 2024 where there is an influx of photography we will work as quickly as we can, but submitters need to be patient.)

If you’d like to contribute photos to the directory, you can do that at WordPress.org/photos.

If you’d like to join the moderators team, you can do that at make.wordpress.org/photos/handbook/moderating-photos.

Current stats for the project as of today, February 2, 2024:

NUMBER OF PHOTOS: 13,250
PENDING PHOTOS: 45
REJECTED PHOTOS: 2242
PHOTOS SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 888
PHOTOS REJECTED SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 212
NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTORS: 1647

Top Contributors:
🥇 mbigul: 845 photos
🥈 topher1kenobe: 841 photos
🥉 shelob9: 453 photos
🏅 mdburnette: 436 photos
🏅 bhuwanroka: 384 photos
🏅 michelleames: 287 photos
🏅 jenniferbourn: 270 photos
🏅 sharankrishna: 198 photos
🏅 kafleg: 191 photos
🏅 chrisedwardsce: 175 photos

Categories:
NATURE: 8934
ARCHITECTURE: 2605
FOOD-DRINK: 1271
ANIMALS: 1124
OBJECTS: 1087
ARTS-CULTURE: 891
TRANSPORTATION: 783
INTERIORS: 378
PATTERNS: 303
TECHNOLOGY: 215
PEOPLE: 207
FASHION: 103
ATHLETICS: 32

Landscape: 8258
Portrait: 4715
Square: 277

Alt Text for WordPress Photos

Our goal is for the WordPress Photo Directory to be as accessible as possible, making it easy for anyone using a screen reader to understand what each photo is, as well as providing good alt text for those using any photos on their own sites and projects.

Alt text provides a description of an image that is read aloud to anyone using a screen reader for any reason.

In the past, some photo contributors have provided descriptions that include feelings or feel more story-like. (Like “waking up on a beautiful morning” or “a great day for a cup of coffee.”) These are not descriptive and are not generally helpful for people relying on screen readers to describe a photo.

In order to help you provide better descriptions when you submit a photo to the directory, we’ve compiled some information to make it easier. (Many thanks to @alexstine and @joedolson for their expertise and input.)

I think we can all agree that there is alt text that’s too short, but are there times when something is too descriptive?

Alex Stine: Sometimes ALT Text can be too descriptive in that it can provide more information than what people could actually see in the image. The experience should be equal, not more or less.

Joe Dolson: There’s a balance to strike. For the purpose of the photo directory, some assumptions need to be made. First, the audience and the author do not have a common knowledge base. For alt text, that means that personal information or specific knowledge of the scene should be omitted. Alt text is highly contextual, and in this case the context is “share the photo with strangers who will use it for their own purposes.” So the alt text should be strictly kept to information that is visible in the image. There are exceptions, however; well-known landmarks can and should be named. If it’s a picture of the Statue of Liberty, it would be disingenuous to omit that information. That’s a judgment call for the submitter, since “well known” is not strictly definable.

Some people think that adding colors to a description isn’t necessary, and others argue that it is. Should submissions to the photo directory include colors? Are there times when it should vs. when it shouldn’t? (Like describing clothes, or a building.)

Alex Stine: I think descriptions of color are okay since you would visually get this detail when looking at an image. People without vision may not fully understand the concept of color if they haven’t had vision before. For people like myself, I have had vision, so I may still be able to get something from knowing the colors.

Joe Dolson: Descriptions don’t need a detailed description of colors, but prominent or dominant colors should be mentioned. Again, it’s a judgment call how much detail to add. But colors should absolutely be mentioned. There are several reasons: one is because screen reader users aren’t necessarily blind and/or may have once had color vision; a second is because color-blind users will benefit from being told what colors are in a picture; and the third is because the photo directory search queries alt texts, so this enables searching for color.

How in-depth should a description be? For example, is “German Shepherd puppy” a good enough description, or would “German Shepherd puppy sitting on a wooden floor looking at the camera” be better?

Alex Stine: In this case, the second description (“German Shepherd puppy sitting on a wooden floor looking at the camera”) would be better. It allows me to more accurately understand the scene.

Joe Dolson: Object, action, and environment are the three primary characteristics that should be conveyed in some way. Anything else is bonus, but ensuring that those three characteristics are communicated is a good way of making sure that the description is roughly equal to the image.

When is including the location of a photo important? Is “mountains” enough or is “mountains in the Himalayas” better?

Alex Stine: This could easily fall in the categoryCategory The 'category' taxonomy lets you group posts / content together that share a common bond. Categories are pre-defined and broad ranging. of “too much information” as that information is not available to people with vision simply by looking at the image. Unless it is clear what the mountain range is by looking at it, this information should not be included in the description.

Joe Dolson: I think I addressed that above; essentially, it’s a question of how common this knowledge would be, or how significant. I will argue slightly with Alex on this because of the purpose of the photo directory – if somebody specifically is looking for pictures of the Himalayas, that should be possible. If the photo directory had any filtering or tagging, I’d say that information should be a tag, rather than an alt text, but, since it isn’t, I think that information should be available. But it’s only particularly important to include in cases where the image is of something that most people would actually recognize. A purposeful image of Mount Everest should probably say what it is. A pretty scene of some mountains that happen to be the Himalayas? Maybe not so relevant.

I want to also add that alternative text should be literal. You should describe what’s in the scene, and not make assumptions. Just to pick a random example:

https://wordpress.org/photos/photo/33465a66b7/

While it may or may not be valuable that this specifies Himalayas (I’d argue not, since there’s nothing distinct), the biggest weakness here is the word ‘Trekker’. It could also mean a Star Trek fan, and if a blind user included this expecting a person hiking with a backpack but it was actually a person in a Star Trek uniform…

Are there tools or resources that you would recommend for evaluating alt text quality and ensuring online content accessibilityAccessibility Accessibility (commonly shortened to a11y) refers to the design of products, devices, services, or environments for people with disabilities. The concept of accessible design ensures both “direct access” (i.e. unassisted) and “indirect access” meaning compatibility with a person’s assistive technology (for example, computer screen readers). (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility)?

Alex Stine: Test with a screen reader, that’s the best way. I also like the Accessibility Checker pluginPlugin A plugin is a piece of software containing a group of functions that can be added to a WordPress website. They can extend functionality or add new features to your WordPress websites. WordPress plugins are written in the PHP programming language and integrate seamlessly with WordPress. These can be free in the WordPress.org Plugin Directory https://wordpress.org/plugins/ or can be cost-based plugin from a third-party.

Joe Dolson: Alt text quality is heavily contextual. No tools required, just read the text and look at the image and decide whether it seems appropriate.

X-post: Call for Mentees & Mentors: Contributor Mentorship Program Cohort #2 (2024 Q1)

X-comment from +make.wordpress.org/community: Comment on Call for Mentees & Mentors: Contributor Mentorship Program Cohort #2 (2024 Q1)

December Stats for the WordPress Photo Directory

December, in fact 2023, has come and gone! And it was an amazing year for the photo directory!

Our goal is to moderate photos as quickly as we can. And with our bigger team, we’ve been working through photos even faster. Please do remember we are all volunteers and work through the list as we are able to in the event there is a .

If you’d like to contribute photos to the directory, you can do that at WordPress.org/photos.

If you’d like to join the moderators team, you can do that at make.wordpress.org/photos/handbook/moderating-photos.

Current stats for the project as of today, January 4, 2024:

NUMBER OF PHOTOS: 12,355
PENDING PHOTOS: 11
REJECTED PHOTOS: 2030
PHOTOS SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 1035
PHOTOS REJECTED SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 171
NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTORS: 1586

Top Contributors:
🥇 topher1kenobe: 823 photos
🥈 mbigul: 740 photos
🥉 shelob9: 440 photos
🏅 mdburnette: 428 photos
🏅 michelleames: 287 photos
🏅 jenniferbourn: 270 photos
🏅 bhuwanroka: 220 photos
🏅 kafleg: 187 photos
🏅 sharankrishna: 176 photos
🏅 chrisedwardsce: 175 photos

Categories:
NATURE (8337)
ARCHITECTURE (2457)
FOOD-DRINK (1138)
ANIMALS (1071)
OBJECTS (1023)
ARTS-CULTURE (855)
TRANSPORTATION (748)
INTERIORS (360)
PATTERNS (300)
TECHNOLOGY (205)
PEOPLE (197)
FASHION (101)
ATHLETICS (28)

Landscape: 7719
Portrait: 4364
Square: 272

X-post: Update on Matrix Migration: Pausing the Transition

X-comment from +make.wordpress.org/project: Comment on Update on Matrix Migration: Pausing the Transition

X-post: Embracing Matrix for Enhanced Communication

X-comment from +make.wordpress.org/project: Comment on Embracing Matrix for Enhanced Communication

November Photo Directory Update

November has come and gone! Let’s take a look at the numbers.

We have added even more new members to the moderator team! Our goal is to moderate photos as quickly as we can. And we’ve been crushing it! Please do remember we are all volunteers and work through the list as we are able to.

If you’d like to contribute photos to the directory, you can do that at WordPress.org/photos.

If you’d like to join the moderators team, you can do that at make.wordpress.org/photos/handbook/moderating-photos.

Current stats for the project as of today, December 1, 2023:

Number of photos: 11520
PENDING PHOTOS: 1
REJECTED PHOTOS: 1878
PHOTOS SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 1168
PHOTOS REJECTED SINCE THE LAST MEETING: 223

Top contributors
🥇 topher1kenobe: 817 photos
🥈 mbigul: 667 photos
🥉 shelob9: 439 photos
🏅 mdburnette: 428 photos
🏅 michelleames: 287 photos
🏅 jenniferbourn: 270 photos
🏅 chrisedwardsce: 175 photos
🏅 kafleg: 170 photos
🏅 sharankrishna: 156 photos
🏅 javiercasares: 152 photos

NATURE (7782)
ARCHITECTURE (2278)
FOOD-DRINK (1045)
ANIMALS (1029)
OBJECTS (980)
ARTS-CULTURE (814)
TRANSPORTATION (716)
INTERIORS (345)
PATTERNS (294)
TECHNOLOGY (185)
PEOPLE (181)
FASHION (92)
ATHLETICS (25)

Landscape: 7198
Portrait: 4066
Square: 257

X-post: Create Tours for Make P2s

X-comment from +make.wordpress.org/meta: Comment on Create Tours for Make P2s

October Photo Directory Update

October is in the books! Time for an update on all things Photos.

We have added new members to the moderator team! Our goal is to moderate photos as quickly as we can. Please do remember we are all volunteers and work through the list as we are able to.

If you’d like to contribute photos to the directory, you can do that at WordPress.org/photos.

If you’d like to join the moderators team, you can do that at make.wordpress.org/photos/handbook/moderating-photos

Current stats for the project as of today, November 1, 2023:

Number of photos: 10,530
Pending photos: 58
Rejected photos: 1665
Photos since the last meeting: 952
Photos rejected since the last meeting: 161
Number of contributors: 1456

Top contributors
🥇 topher1kenobe: 810 photos
🥈 mbigul: 531 photos
🥉 shelob9: 425 photos
🏅 mdburnette: 424 photos
🏅 michelleames: 287 photos
🏅 jenniferbourn: 270 photos
🏅 chrisedwardsce: 175 photos
🏅 javiercasares: 125 photos
🏅 kafleg: 119 photos
🏅 mburridge: 113 photos

Categories
NATURE (7084)
ARCHITECTURE (2080)
ANIMALS (979)
OBJECTS (956)
FOOD-DRINK (931)
ARTS-CULTURE (769)
TRANSPORTATION (681)
INTERIORS (319)
PATTERNS (291)
TECHNOLOGY (168)
PEOPLE (165)
FASHION (70)
ATHLETICS (24)

Landscape 7969
Portrait 4238
Square 303