Theme Review Team

Welcome to the Theme Review team.

We are a group of volunteers who review and approve themes submitted to be included in the official WordPress Theme directory.

The Theme Review team maintains the official Theme Review Guidelines, the Theme Unit Test Data, and the Theme Check Plugin.

We also engage and educate the WordPress Theme community regarding best practices for themes.

Interested in joining the Theme Reviewers team?

Great! The team is open to anyone who wants to help out, and the process is simple. To find out more just visit the Join The Team page.

Want to know more? There is a more information in the Theme Review Team’s Handbook and the Review itself.

Once you get a theme to review, you will also get a mentor to help you on the road to becoming a theme reviewer.

Weekly meetings

We use Slack for real-time communication. As contributors live all over the world, there are discussions happening at all hours of the day.

We have a project meeting every Tuesday at 18:00 UTC in the #themereview channel on Slack.

There are also weekly mentor meeting hours every Thursday at 18:00 UTC in #themereview

Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Dion Hulse 8:11 am on May 20, 2015 Permalink |  

    Hi Everyone,

    Just letting you know that today I’ve rolled out the start of the international Theme Directories, for example: https://ro.wordpress.org/themes/

    A few points that impact both Theme Reviewers and Theme Authors:

    • Theme submissions from these localised sites are possible, if theme reviewers start to see an increase in non-english uploads, please let the meta team know so we can alter wording/warnings for those uploading to be more clear
    • Theme Descriptions are not yet translated, even if the theme ships with translations of the description. We’ll be working on that part next. This will also apply to any eventual readme improvements we make.
  • Frank Klein 4:54 pm on May 19, 2015 Permalink |  

    A Guide to Writing Secure Themes – Part 1: Introduction 

    As a developer, keeping your users secure should be your most important priority.

    Having a theme available on WordPress.org is a huge responsibility, because security issues make every site running the theme potentially vulnerable.

    This guide will give you an introduction to the techniques you can apply to write secure code.

    The guide is broken up into parts to make it easier to read and apply. It contains everything I learned over the past three years while reviewing themes for WordPress.org, premium themes for WordPress.com, as well as themes and plugins for WordPress.com VIP.

    Before we get to the techniques, let’s have a look at the principles of secure code.

    Principles of secure code

    Writing secure code is not about using a particular function, tool, or workflow. Those things change over time, with new development techniques emerging and new security issues arising.

    The common element that connects all these things together is the state of mind of the developer. This mindset is based on three principles:

    1. Don’t assume anything. Only act on what you know for sure.
    2. Don’t trust any data. Consider data invalid and insecure until proven valid and secure.
    3. Don’t become complacent. Web technologies evolve, and so do best practices.

    With these principles on our mind, let’s clarify the meaning of a few terms we’re going to use in this series.

    Commonly used terms

    Input and output

    When we talk about input, this designates all the data that is given to our code.

    The most prevalent use case is information entered by the user, for example into a form field or the browser address bar. But it also encompasses data retrieved from stored cookies or from external services, like the Twitter API.

    Themes deal with this data in various ways. They might store it into the database, use it to retrieve data from the database, or display it to the user.

    When we talk about displaying information, we use the word output. But output is not just what we see on the screen, it’s all the data provided by our code.

    Imagine a PHP script that passes data to a Javascript script, such as data used to initialize a slider for example. In this case, the PHP outputs the data that is then used as input by the Javascript.

    If your code connects to a REST API, the JSON data returned by the API is the output, that your code then uses as input.

    Dynamic and static data

    When we talk about dynamic or static data, this is not to be confused with the static keyword in PHP.

    When we talk about static data, we designate data that cannot be changed except by changing the code. Here is an example:

    <?php echo 'Hello World'; ?>

    So when you read static, think of static HTML pages. These documents cannot return information that is not present in their source code.

    Dynamic data on the other hand can be modified through different ways. For example:

    <?php echo __( 'Hello World', 'wptrt' ); ?>

    In this code sample, the __() translation function returns data. This data can be filtered, or modified by loading a translation.

    What we are outputting is the return value of the function. Let’s look at this in more detail.

    Return values

    Return values is data provided by a function. In PHP you often see these return statements in functions:

    function wptrt_add_numbers( $a, $b ) {
        return $a + $b;

    Functions can return all kinds of data. Currently in PHP there is no way to force a function to return a certain type of data.

    This is important to keep in mind, because a lot of WordPress functions contain filters. So you can never be sure about the data that a certain function returns.

    Now that we have seen the vocabulary, we’ll look at common attacks.

    Common attacks

    In order for you to secure your code, you need to understand how attacks work.

    A good starting point is to read through the list of the Top 10 attacks in 2013, published by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP).

    Google Application security also has a very good introduction to Cross-Site scription (XSS) attacks. You actually can test out these attacks in the browser.

    If you are interested in specific attacks for WordPress, I recommend reading the Sucuri Blog.


    This part should have provided you with a good overview of what security is, the related terminology, and the type of attacks encountered.

    In the next part, we’re going to look at how you can protect against some of these attacks by validating data before use.

  • Tammie 4:55 pm on May 16, 2015 Permalink |  

    Weekly meeting

    This week we have our usual meeting at 18:00 UTC. So far the topics are:

    • Keeping up with core. There are tickets we should be paying attention to, how do we do that?
    • @greenshady would like to talk about adding customizer examples to the WPTRT github repo.
    • @chipbennett would like to talk about licenses.

    If there is anything else you’d like to talk about please note it here.

    • Chip Bennett 12:43 am on May 17, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Actually, I want to talk about both Favicons, and CC 4.0 license compatibility with GPL.

      • Samuel Wood (Otto) 11:34 pm on May 18, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I know all the details on CC 4.0. Ping me when the topic comes up, and i’ll come around to explain it

        • Chip Bennett 11:49 pm on May 18, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          I’ll ping you when the meeting starts, assuming I’m able to make it. The TL;DR version of what I want to propose is that CC-By 4.0, as listed as GPL-compatible for non-code artistic works by GNU, should be acceptable for directory-hosted Themes in that specific context:

          In general, I think we should adhere to our current policy of accepting what GNU accepts. Since GNU now accepts CC-By 4.0 as GPL-compatible for “art and entertainment works, and educational works”, then we should do likewise, for “art and entertainment works, and educational works” bundled with Themes. The main impact would be for image files, I think.

    • Justin Tadlock 7:54 pm on May 18, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I might not be able to make the meeting tomorrow because my father is coming down to my place. It really just depends on what time he gets here. I’ll leave some notes about what I wanted to discuss with the customizer examples here in the comments if I can’t make it.

      • Justin Tadlock 3:48 pm on May 19, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        If I’m not able to make it today, the idea that I was thinking about is creating a GitHub repo for the WPTRT account that shares customizer examples.

        • Show how to utilize all of the “out of the box” customizer controls.
        • Show how to do more advanced controls, settings, etc.
        • Show how to manipulate controls with JS.
  • Tammie 8:59 pm on May 13, 2015 Permalink |  

    This week’s meeting

    We had a meeting this week at 18:00 UTC in #themereview. Here are the archives: https://wordpress.slack.com/archives/themereview/p1431453803000795

    We talked about a range of things. There was no set agenda but these things came up:

    • How hard it is to say what custom content should be in a theme and what a plugin.
    • The Rest API came up. As with all new things there is a lot of excitement – which is great. Right now, it’s about experimenting. There is no right or wrong way. There is no theme to use or not use. If you are interested and want to start experimenting, check out http://themeshaper.com/2015/05/07/theming-with-the-rest-api-meet-picard/. For now, it’s all about having fun with the format. Fork themes and play!
    • There was a mention of the PR for _s of the readme.txt file by @jami0821. This is was merged today.
  • Tammie 9:41 pm on May 11, 2015 Permalink |  

    Meeting agenda for Tuesday 18:00 UTC

    We have no agenda set. So, lets do some general catch up with everyone. If you have something you want to bring up, you can mention it here or there will be time during the meeting.

    • Justin Tadlock 6:26 pm on May 12, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I’m attempting to join the meeting. But, after a couple of months with no Slack issues, they had to start back right before the meeting today. :(

  • Justin Tadlock 6:38 pm on May 7, 2015 Permalink |

    Customizer tutorials and documentation 

    One of the things that TRT has been doing over the past several months is striving to make education a top priority. We’ve got some awesome things in the pipeline (look out for design and accessibility resources soon).

    Today’s topic is about utilizing the Customization API (i.e., the theme customizer). Over the past week I’ve been gathering links to various tutorials to share with theme authors. There’s actually quite a bit that’s been written on the customizer. I thought it’d be helpful to consolidate some of these into one place.

    This list is just a sampling of what’s out there. It also gives us an idea of what hasn’t been written about so that we can strive to provide more examples.

    Official Documentation

    Of course, the best place to start is the developer handbook right here on WordPress.org. So, dive into the Customizer API docs before anything.

    General and Basic Tutorials

    The following tutorials are mostly overviews and general tutorials on the basics of working with the customizer. A few dive into some more advanced topics, but for the most part, they’re good for getting acquainted with the customizer.

    Advanced and Specific Topics

    • mattmedeiros 7:40 pm on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Wanted to include our 3 part series on working with the customizer and the previewer. This tutorial explores adding “helper” buttons to the previewer which communicate with the customizer. Opening panels/sections, passing data, and more.


      • usability.idealist 10:37 pm on May 15, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply


        Hell, that’s been one of the most helpful (series of) tutorial(s) for the Customizer for ages!

        Where is the like-button if you need it? Ah well .. Guess the old “+1″ has to do it! 😉

        I’d wish folks would go more into detail how to actually work with the JS and not focus on how to create pansy, easy-peasy stuff. That’s been my major cause of headache – or maybe call it “grief” – since I started intensely wrestling with the Customizer last year (ie. April 2014).

        cu, w0lf.

        • Justin Tadlock 1:49 am on May 16, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          I’ve just started working with JS on the customize controls side of things (nothing too advanced yet), but maybe there’s a tutorial or two I can get out of it.

          Of course, there’s JS on the preview side as well. I’ve worked with that a bit. You kind of have to for live previews.

          Anyway, I’m no JS guru, but I’d love to hear about anything in particular you’d like to learn about. Maybe it’ll get my creative juices flowing.

    • Emil Uzelac 6:27 am on May 8, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      You nailed it!

    • Matt Hill 7:01 am on May 8, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Fantastic resources, thank you for compiling these Justin.

    • Jami Gibbs 11:40 am on May 8, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Stellar. Thanks Justin!

    • Samuel Wood (Otto) 12:43 pm on May 8, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

    • Maria Antonietta Perna 2:36 pm on May 9, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      At last some great educational buzz on the Customizer! Thanks :)

    • wpweaver 3:52 pm on May 14, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      At some point, if I remember right, you or someone else generously offered to take comments on limitations in the Customizer interface, and perhaps work on implementing new features.

      Is there an ongoing thread for such a specific discussion? I have a few significant suggestions, but they obviously belong elsewhere.

      • Justin Tadlock 4:55 pm on May 14, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        The idea is to put together control classes (possibly setting classes) to extend the customizer that theme authors don’t know how to build. I’m personally doing tutorials on each that I build to explain things. Anyway, this is as good of a place as any to ask.

        • wpweaver 3:31 pm on May 16, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          OK –
          1. The Customizer apparently uses the WP color picker. The color picker has, in my opinion, a serious lack that would totally frustrate any serious site designer – no way to handle transparency. It seems you can just specify a solid hex color. It really needs to be able to support named colors, including ‘transparent’, as well as rgba or other transparency standard. It is time to move beyond IE8 color support, I think. I really can’t believe that every single place there is a color option (any where on standard WP options) that only solid colors are allowed.

          2. All the Customizer examples I’ve seen only have menus one level deep (only the right arrow at the top most level). This may just be restricted thinking, but can one go deeper?

          3. One of the most serious flaws with Customizer when it comes to designing user friendly, helpful interfaces (as opposed to simply consistent ones) is the limited width. This makes it EXTREMELY difficult to provide appropriate context help within each panel/tab – a good explanation of a feature simply takes up too much space. What would really help this situation would be a universal, standard pop-up help symbol (like a ? or “i” icon) that the theme developer could easily specify, and the end user could click to get a tool-tip-like pop-up help field.

          4. Text entry fields seem really small – again, the limited width. For example, one option that seems to be somewhat common in themes using Customizer with more advanced options is a custom CSS field. It would be very helpful to the end user if there were a mechanism to auto-expand these fields, or at least have some resizing capability. Believe it or not, some site designers actually would like to be able to see their custom CSS rules more like they can in a real editor, and not crunched up in a tiny little box. Makes life so much simpler.
          (Just a dream, but a really nice CSS editor window with syntax highlighting and CSS rule generation help would be fantastic, but is obviously not high priority.)

          5. BG colors? Having shaded or colored backgrounds on different panels can greatly enhance the user experience. Is this supported?

          6. Hidden/Advanced options. It can be a very helpful practice to hide or shrink more advanced options to help avoid clutter. So it would be nice to have a built-in option to have some options easily expand/contract. Just adding another panel does not solve this interfact design issue as these advanced options are usually associated with a more basic option and should be in the same place.

          • Ulrich 4:07 pm on May 16, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            1. What do you use in your settings page?
            2. I am not sure. I have never tested it.
            3. I think you should not need to much contex help as the user will be able to see the changes happening live on their site. Here is an interesting talk related to this from LoopConf: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7usuZRBsyk8
            4. I opedned a trac ticket for this https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/32296
            5. You should be able to load CSS styles on the customizer page and style the customizer like you want like you have done in the settings pages.
            6. It should be possible to extend the customizer to include this.

          • Justin Tadlock 4:12 pm on May 16, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            1) I believe Kirki has a color control that allows transparency. I’d definitely check that out. Another option is to use a basic range input to allow transparency control. It’d mean a separate setting, but I’ve seen this done on a couple of themes before.

            2) Panels allow you to go two levels deep.

            3) Otto shows how to change change the width in his most recent tutorial. I also plan to write a tutorial on customizing the customizer that goes into a bit more depth. As for a univeral help symbol, that’s an idea you’ll need to get in touch with the customizer team about.

            4) Have you looked into how large widgets slide out to the side of the customizer? That’s one option that I think would work here. I’ll be honest and say that I don’t know how that’s done. I’d love to see a non-core theme/plugin that does it.

            5) Do you mean colored customizer panel/section backgrounds? Yep, that’s doable. Follow the custom CSS example in Otto’s tutorial I linked above. I can also cover this in my tutorial.

            6) This is actually possible now. I’ll need to write out the code and probably a tutorial on it.

    • Tomas Mackevicius 1:53 am on May 19, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Is it possible to get validator like there is one for plugin readme:


  • Samuel Sidler 3:01 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink |  

    Genericons and Theme Updates 

    Earlier today, the core security team shipped new versions of a number of themes that were vulnerable to a cross-site scripting issue due to shipping a Genericons example file. This was in conjunction with WordPress 4.2.2 but happened hours prior to it shipping. This is the first time we’ve updated themes without notifying the theme authors ahead of time, so I wanted to make sure that we let you know that it happened and answer any question you have.

    Note: Among the themes updated was Twenty Fifteen due to the same vulnerability.

    If you have any questions, feel free to ask and I’ll do my best to respond to them.

    • Jeff Chandler 3:57 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Is it possible to see a list of affected themes?

    • Jose Castaneda 5:06 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Thanks for letting us know Sam!

    • Stephen Cronin 7:49 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Just wondering – when you say “the core security team shipped new versions”, do you mean that they just updated the themes on wordpress.org, or do you mean they force updated users’ sites?

      If they force updated users’ sites, I’d be really curious as to whether the number of users losing customizations (ie having edited files) was a significant issue or not. I’m not sure the average user knows how to use child themes, which is a pity.

      • Samuel Wood (Otto) 9:34 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        We updated the themes on WordPress.org with new version numbers. These versions were identical to the previous versions, with only the single problem file removed.

    • Deborah 3:28 pm on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Thanks for the update. Appreciate all the work from the security team. Like Jeff, I’d be interested in the list of updated themes.

  • Tammie 9:03 pm on May 6, 2015 Permalink |  

    Theme review team weekly meeting notes

    The logs are here:

    Points from meeting:

    • @jcastenada updated on the readme.txt. This will be a new recommended item for all reviews.
    • @jami0821 and @melchoyce updated us on the design handbook. They are going to try and get Custom CSS thanks to @samuelsidler who will look into this for the handbook. This will help with examples.
    • @davidakennedy and @joedolson have been hard at work with the doing_it_accessibily_wrong theme. Videos are coming really soon. This is all really exciting as means we can train sooner.
    • The queue push was a great success, so much we’re going to have another one every month. The last Saturday of every month will be the push day. That makes the next one 30th May.
  • Tammie 11:28 am on May 5, 2015 Permalink |  

    This week’s meeting agenda

    We have a meeting today at 18:00 utc. Lets get updates on the following:

  • Jose Castaneda 10:36 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink |  

    A revised readme 

    In our meeting we talked about the addition of a changelog. The consensus was including it in the readme.txt file like plugins do. To quote Otto:

    If we had it in the readme.txt, we’d expose the data to core via the API, same as we already do with plugins

    In order to make this happen we need to determine what – from the plugin’s readme – we can use, create a sample file and have all theme authors adopt it. @greenshady provided a sample one and @grapplerulrich even added in about a dedicated license section – which I think we can do.

    Below is a revised version of Justin’s and includes Ulrich’s idea of the bundled resources section.

    === Theme Name ===
    Contributors: (this should be a list of wordpress.org userid's)
    Tags: left-sidebar, fixed-width, custom-background
    Requires at least: 4.0
    Tested up to: 4.3-alpha
    Stable tag: 1.0.3
    License: GPLv2 or later
    License URI: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
    Short description. No more than 150 chars.
    == Description ==
    Theme desc.
    == Frequently Asked Questions ==
    = A question that someone might have =
    An answer to that question.
    == Changelog ==
    = 1.0 =
    * Added new option
    = 0.5 =
    * Security bug addressed
    * Changed thumbnail size
    == Upgrade Notice ==
    = 1.0 =
    * Upgrade notices describe the reason a user should upgrade.  No more than 300 characters.
    = 0.5 =
    * This version fixes a security related bug.  Upgrade immediately.
    == Resources ==
    * magnify.jpg © 2014 Jane Doe, CC0
    * supermenu.js © 2013-2015 James Today, MIT 

    Chime in and discuss!

    • NateWr 10:40 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      It would be terrific if the specification encouraged (required?) dates for each release in the Changelog. A lot of plugins don’t include them, but it’s a great way to get a sense of a product’s maintenance record over time.

    • Justin Tadlock 11:03 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      The only issue I see with a “License/Resources” section is if a theme author normally puts those licenses in a LICENSE file. I’d even argue that the license file should be the preferred method of adding license + copyright declarations. Nevertheless, I think it’s a good idea to account for it in the readme.txt standard format.

      It’s something to consider anyway.

      • Samuel Wood (Otto) 1:27 am on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I agree, a separate license file is better. It can be an optional “other”section if you like though. Dunno. Licenses matter, but not enough to expose this to end users like that.

        • Chip Bennett 3:18 pm on May 7, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          I don’t agree that a separate license file is *better*. I don’t think either approach is better or worse than the other. If there are infrastructure/implementation reasons to favor one over the other, then I understand. Otherwise, I see it as a bikeshed question, and have no reason to argue strongly for one or the other.

          • usability.idealist 9:37 pm on May 15, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            A separate LICENSE file is BETTER, because it’s lessening the overall structocalypse. The user doesnt give a lot about what’s underneath, and in most cases, no developer will care much about the LICENSE of the resources, as long as they work.

            So, putting up to 30 different license items into the README file would clutter it up tremendiously.

            TL;DR: +1 for licenses listed in the file of the same name, to enforce structure and reduce clutter.

            cu, w0lf.

    • Justin Tadlock 11:10 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Some more ideas to ponder. Some things to consider dropping from the header:

      • Contributors – Is this useful with only one theme author allowed?
      • Tags – Already defined in style.css
      • Stable tag – Theme repo always uses latest version
      • License – Defined in style.css
      • License URI – Defined in style.css

      I also dislike the “Tested up to” header because it can give users a bad impression if you’re not updating your theme once every couple of months (most themes don’t need this much updating).

      • Ulrich 11:19 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Contributors may be possible sometime in the future. Otto said he has some similar code which he could use. https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/27

      • Tammie 9:38 am on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I actually think contributors is important. I have in the past worked on a multiple authored theme that ended up with an account having to be made we all accessed – not awesome. We then still couldn’t credit everyone. It was a bit sad as a community project for BuddyPress.

      • Tammie 9:39 am on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        Tested up to is important from a ‘what does it work with’. I actually think you could say supported versions and be less dramatic.

        • Chip Bennett 3:26 pm on May 2, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          “Tested up to” and “Requires” are important in combination, and could be used very powerfully by the WP Admin, by hiding (or requiring a confirmation before installing) Themes that do not support the user’s current WordPress version.

          For example, I provide no intentional backward compatibility in my Theme. So, my “Requires” is almost always the same as, or perhaps one version prior to, the current WordPress version. So, if someone running an older version tries to install my Theme, the Admin could compare the user’s version (e.g. 3.9) to my Theme’s “Requires” and “Tested up to” (e.g. 4.0), and either not show my Theme, or display an “are you sure?” dialogue or something.

          • usability.idealist 9:50 pm on May 15, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            Maybe just a big fat notice.

            Hiding things is nasty (it’s basically censorship, but that’s another topic).
            Just take a look at Firefox Extension directory. LOTS of the stuff in there hasn’t been “updated” to work with current versions .. but about 70% of them do so.

            Now, Mozilla is hiding them from view, and you have to explicitely UN-select the automatically claimed FF version. Of corpse, you have to know that in the first place. So for un-experienced users, who just want to get their site roling quickly (and I’d say they’re making up the majority of the WP users), even such an option would be .. well, I’d guess most of them wouldn’t even recognize it.

            And: Although I’d consider myself a professional with the web and its UI shenannigans in general, but sometimes it still happens that I oversee this option, coursing and cruising WTF the extensions I wanted are not being displayed .. starting to fume again when finaily remembering that option.

            TL;DR: Annoying your users in the first place is not the best.

            So +1 for a big fat notice.

            -1 for a “click something” prompt. Thanks to Windows, the current “we use cookies, did you know” thingy and the recent data security apocalypse, most users are potty-trained to automatically click on the “okay” button.

            cu, w0lf.

      • Jose Castaneda 8:28 pm on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        • tags/license/license uri – I agree, a little redundant.
        • stable tag – I only consider this because there are some that link to a github repo
      • Chip Bennett 3:23 pm on May 2, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I like “Tested up to”, but perhaps for Themes, we could keep it at major versions only. There is almost no reason for a Theme to break due to a point release.

        Plugins are potentially different, but for a Theme that properly differentiates between presentation and functionality, keeping “Tested up to” current for major releases should suffice.

    • Tomas Mackevicius 11:15 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Is it required to use format:

      == Resources ==

      or I could use:



    • Tomas Mackevicius 11:18 pm on April 29, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Also I used to think that Stable Tag was about WP version, but in this example it doesn’t look like.

    • Emil Uzelac 12:58 am on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Contributors! Will that work?

    • Edward Caissie 1:10 am on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      As offered in Slack … I go with this currently (from my Opus Primus them):

      === Opus Primus readme.txt ===

      • Last revised April 28, 2015

      == Contents ==

      • Copyright
      • Licenses
      • Screenshots
      • Basic FAQ
      • Notes
      • Changelog
      • Review Tickets

      == Copyright ==
      Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Opus Primus

      This file is part of Opus Primus.

      Opus Primus is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
      terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as published by the Free
      Software Foundation.

      You may NOT assume that you can use any other version of the GPL.

      This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
      WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.

      You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
      this program; if not, write to:

      Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
      Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA

      The license for this software can also likely be found here:

      Note: All Opus Primus file Copyright years start with the first year of use and
      are amended with subsequent years based on theme publication regardless of any
      change or modification to the actual file.

      == Licenses ==
      All items are licensed under the GNU General Public License v2; or, as the case
      may be, individually noted below.

      • Normalize.css is a project by Nicolas Gallagher and Jonathan Neal. A minimized

      version is used. Licensed as Public Domain

      • Font: Merienda One

      Copyright (c) 2011, Eduardo Tunni (http://www.tipo.net.ar), with Reserved Font Name “Merienda”
      This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1.
      This license is available with a FAQ at: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL

      • Font: Underwood Champion

      Copyright (c) 2009, Vic Fieger (http://www.vicfieger.com/)
      The Vic Fieger fonts are freeware, to be downloaded and used by anyone who wants them for free.
      This license can also be found at this permalink: http://www.fontsquirrel.com/license/Underwood-Champion

      • Theme Hook Alliance

      Licensed as GNU General Public License, v2 (or newer)
      The details of the copyright and license of this work may be found internal to
      the relevant files found under ..\stanzas\tha\ or at this website: https://github.com/zamoose/themehookalliance

      • SlickNav – Responsive Mobile Menu jQuery Plugin – Version 1.0.1

      Copyright (c) 2014, Josh Cope (http://slicknav.com)
      Opus Primus uses an adaptation of the plugin which is under a MIT License
      The details of the license can be found under ../js/SlickNav/MIT-LICENSE.txt
      Only the relevant files have been included, a complete download can be found at https://github.com/ComputerWolf/SlickNav

      • FitVids – built by Chris Coyier and Paravel – Version 1.1

      Copyright (c) 2013, Chris Coyier – http://css-tricks.com + Dave Rupert – http://daverupert.com
      Released under the WTFPL license – http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
      Only the plugin file has been included, the complete project can be found at https://github.com/davatron5000/FitVids.js

      This above may not be construed as overriding any item with a previously written
      and applied license, stated or not, which will take precedence over anything
      written here.

      == Screenshots ==

      == Basic FAQ ==
      Q: I just updated to version 1.3, what could be causing these child-theme errors?
      With version 1.3 of Opus Primus the calls to the classes were changed from using
      `require_once` to `locate_template`. This then followed files being updated from
      calling the class global variable to creating a “new” class instance as needed.
      This is expected to provide better child-theme compatibility going forward and
      only be a one-time correction for existing child-themes.

      Q: What are Stanzas?
      Stanzas are meant to add additional functionality specifically to Opus Primus by
      either using specific Opus Primus assets, such as a particular font face; or, by
      hooking into specific action and/or filter hooks only found in Opus Primus.

      Q: What is the difference between how the “Featured Image” is used on a post and
      how it is used on a page?
      The “Featured Image” on a page is set to ideally be used as a “banner” on pages;
      and, to add emphasis for posts when they are viewed as part of a list, such as
      the index view or in archives.

      Q: How do the breadcrumb trails work?
      There are two different breadcrumb trails used in Opus Primus. One type is used
      on pages and shows the page hierarchy from the highest level to the lowest. The
      second trail is used on single views of posts and shows the first category and
      Post-Format of the post, both linked to their respective archive.

      Q: Where are the menu locations, and how are they used?
      There are three menu locations defined in Opus Primus.

      • The Primary Menu, located at the top of the page above the main content area.
      • The Secondary Menu, no location is set by default; the menu has been pre-

      defined for uses as the case may be, for example, page templates or Child-Themes

      • The Search Results Menu, located at the bottom of the content area when there

      are no search results returned, especially in the case of a “404” error be sent.

      Q: Is Opus Primus designed to be responsive to multiple screen sizes?
      In a word, no. Although the theme does include some minimal CSS specifically
      geared towards being responsive to multiple screen sizes the ideal method we
      recommend at this time is to take advantage of one of the many quality plugins
      available from the WordPress Extend Plugins repository to handle these requests.
      Please note, we intend to continue in our efforts to provide an inclusive method
      of managing these requests in future versions.

      Q: How do I modify an existing function from one of the classes?
      Most WordPress functions included with the theme will have their own filter,
      otherwise it would be recommended to extend the class and overload the theme
      function you are trying to modify.

      Q: How does Opus Primus automatically handle multiple column layouts?
      Through some CSS trickery and code logic Opus Primus will display by default
      one, two, or three columns depending on which sidebar widget areas are active.
      There are four(4) widget areas built into two sidebar areas.

      The following will show how, if active, they affect the layout:

      • Full Page (one-column): no active sidebar widget areas
      • Two-Column: widget areas active in only one sidebar area
      • Three-Column: at least one widget area active in each sidebar area

      Q: What happened to the LESS components of the theme?
      The LESS components of the theme were effectively removed at version 1.2 as a
      means to improve load time. The styles that were generated by the LESS script
      and related file were compiled and merged into the main theme stylesheet.

      == Notes ==
      1. $content_width is set based on how many columns being used and the common
      display size of 1024px * 768px.

      This being the case, the following widths will be used:

      • one-column: 990px
      • two-column: 700px
      • three-column: 450px

      2. Default Menu depth levels may be of concern in some cases. As it stands, the
      default menus are not restricted to any specific depth except the Search Results
      Menu which is restricted to a single level only when a custom menu is not used.

      3. Future revisions of the ‘theme-version-guidelines.txt’ file may not
      necessarily be recorded in the changelog. The “Theme Version Guidelines” page
      found at http://opusprimus.com/under-the-page/theme-version-guidelines/ will
      be considered the most current at all times. The version of the guidelines
      included with the theme will simply be a copy of the noted page.

      == Changelog ==
      === Opus Primus changelog.txt ===
      Last revised April 18, 2015
      Please note, the Opus Primus copyright can be found at the end of this file.

      = Version 1.4 =

      • Released …

      = Code =

      • Added `widgets` to the HTML5 theme supported items
      • Added `number_format_i18n` to better accommodate locale based values
      • Added two classes for use in rendering the comments link text displayed … or not
      • Added `Share the Author Wealth` method, not implemented as a display element, yet
      • Change all classes to a singleton style
      • Ensure `$pagination` has been initialized in `OpusPrimusNavigation::pagination` method
      • Moved the `support_comment` method back into the `OpusPrimusStructures` class
      • Moved the `before_comment_form` and `comments_form_closed` methods back into the `OpusPrimusComments` class
      • Refactored `OpusPrimusComments::comments_link` to use the WordPress core more effectively
      • Removed `$screen` parameter as not necessary in Taglines Stanza
      • Renamed file `class.OpusPrimusHeaders.php` to `class.OpusPrimusHeader.php` for consistency

      = CSS =

      • Added class definition to hide comment link text when comments are closed and there are no comments
      • Adjusted CSS to not reference `li` elements in default widget styles

      = Miscellaneous =

      • i18n: Added base `.po` file as well as English (Canadian) `.pomo` files
      • i18n: `null` does not need to be translated
      • i18n: Symbolic characters do not need to be translated
      • Added `opus_authors_list` filter hook
      • Continue removal of extraneous end of structure comments …

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      = Version 1.3.4 =

      • Released March 2015

      = Code =

      • Used a more specific element identifier for the SlickNav `prependTo` parameter

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Continue removal of extraneous end of structure comments …

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      = Version 1.3.3 =

      • Released March 2015
      • Added sanity checks to ensure there is actually an image in use when returning the featured image view.

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      = Version 1.3.2 =

      • Released March 2015
      • Added support for the `title` tag via `add_theme_support` function

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      = Version 1.3.1 =

      • Released March 2015

      = Code =

      • Added `get_the_posts_pagination` for navigation between pages of posts
      • Added `hide_category_widget_list_items` method and related hook
      • Added some escaping sanitization and linked Featured Image to post via the post ID
      • Changed method to return the Featured Thumbnail versus outputting it
      • Changed from using `get_the_time` to `date_i18n` for `OpusPrimusImages::exif_timestamp` method
      • Extracted code from `featured_thumbnail` method to create `featured_thumbnail_single_view` method
      • Improved look of navigation links in `OpusPrimusNavigation::multiple_pages_link` method

      = CSS =

      • Added `=== Screen Reader Text ===` section
      • Added `h5.comments-link` definition to provide a better aesthetic location
      • Added styling to navigation for moving within a single post’s pages
      • Incorporated WordPress recommended styles for `.screen-reader-text` class

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Added `opus_featured_thumbnail_single_view_portrait` filter hook and updated `hooks-filters.txt`
      • Begin removal of extraneous end of structure comments …
      • Inline documentation clean-up and re-organization
      • Updated `hooks-filters.txt` file

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.3 ==

      • Released November 2014

      = Code =

      • Added `post-title-link` wrapper class to better manage Post Title output
      • Added WordPress HTML5 markup support for search form, comment form, comment list, and caption
      • Added sanity checks to ensure constants are not already defined
      • Added `OpusPrimusRouter` class to replace path and URL CONSTANTS
      • Added Child-Theme “slug” for easier customizations
      • Added empty hooks before and after showing the breadcrumbs
      • Added OpusPrimusComments class methods to `functions.php` to work-around duplicate output issue
      • Added checks for Child-Theme and relevant references to `opus_primus_support_comment`
      • Better code organization to only load classes when needed
      • Changed post breadcrumb link to the WordPress shortlink
      • Create `/lib/` folder to store bundled libraries and ancillary files
      • Enqueue JavaScripts and CSS for SlickNav JavaScript plugin integration to handle mobile menus
      • Extracted the Opus Primus PullQuotes Stanza (see https://github.com/Cais/opus-primus-pullquotes)
      • Moved `support_comment` method to `functions.php` to eliminate duplicate output
      • Replaced the majority of `require_once` calls with `locate_template` calls
      • Replaced `global` variable calls with `new` class instances
      • Update to use `preg_match_all` in OpusPrimusGallery featured and secondary id methods

      = CSS =

      • Added new typography styles for better reading
      • Added styles for the “BNS Login” plugin
      • Added `clear: both` to `footer`
      • Added `width: auto;` for `th` and `td` elements
      • Added `#header-widgets` to the “Clearance” section of `opus-primus.css`
      • Added minor `attachment` related styles
      • Added better search form aesthetics in the sidebar
      • Change default `ul` list-style property to `none inside`
      • Hide the post/page breadcrumbs in mobile displays
      • Hide “Search” button for search form
      • Removed duplicate definitions from media queries stylesheet
      • Removed unused `div#top-navigation-menu` definition
      • Removed unused `nav div.nav ul li` definition
      • Updated `editor-style.css` to match new typography of theme
      • Updated galleries styles to use HTML5 markup
      • Updated font-size of excerpt more link symbol to 35px from 200%

      = JavaScript =

      = Miscellaneous

      • Added Contact Form 7 compatibility
      • Added BNS Login compatibility to use `dashicons` display
      • Added Gravity Forms compatibility (for reCaptcha form)
      • Added to `readme.txt` FAQ “I just updated to version 1.3, what could be causing these child-theme errors?”
      • Removed `works-in-progress` folder from theme
      • Updated `readme.txt` to note the use and license of SlickNav by Josh Cope
      • Updated `readme.txt` to note the use and license of FitVids by Chris Coyier and Paravel
      • Updated `readme.txt` to remove FAQ item related to blank menu items; resolved in WordPress core trac ticket #23254
      • Updated `style.css` description to emphasize the addition of the SlickNav and FitVids libraries
      • Updated `screenshot.png` to better reflect latest release
      • Updated `hooks-actions.txt` with new additions

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2.5 ==

      • Released July 2014

      = Code =

      • Added new method `OpusPrimusNavigation::pagination` for moving between pages of posts
      • Added new method `OpusPrimusNavigation::pagination_wrapped` to provide actions hooks before and after the `pagination` method
      • Added `antispambot` email protection to author biography email addresses
      • Added sanity checks to ensure widgets are active before rendering sidebars
      • Added `opus_primus_defaults.php` to replace `$opus_defaults` class
      • Added `opus-primus-ignite.php` to reduce clutter in `functions.php`
      • Added `opus_image_link_navigation_output` filter hook to provide access to navigation output
      • Added `opus_tagline` to default hidden screen options array
      • Adjusted the `OpusPrimusStructures::the_loop` and `OpusPrimusStructures::the_loop_archives` to use the `pagination_wrapped` method
      • Changed navigation method from `posts_link` to `pagination`
      • Changed single view first year of copyright to published year of post/page in `OpusPrimusStructures::copyright` method
      • Deprecated `OpusPrimusDefaults` class (file may be removed in a future release)
      • Enqueue custom stylesheet in an update safe location `/wp-content/opus-primus-customs/`
      • Enqueue custom JavaScript in an update safe location `/wp-content/opus-primus-customs/`
      • Refactored all defaults using true/false to use filtered define statements
      • Refactored `OpusPrimusTaglines::tagline_create_boxes` to clarify the parameter usage
      • Remove conditional customization enqueue using internal theme folder
      • Renamed `opus-ignite.php` to `opus-primus-ignite.php` and moved to theme root
      • Renamed `OpusPrimusNavigation::image_nav` to `OpusPrimusNavigation::image_link_navigation`
      • Replaced `OpusPrimusStructures::replace_spaces` with `sanitize_html_class`
      • Set Customization path and URL CONSTANTS

      = CSS =

      • Added `Navigation` section and `Pagination Method` sub-section
      • Complete refactoring of the `@media` query styles for better responsiveness
      • Corrected `select` element to use “max-width” rather than “width”
      • Fixed white space on right side of iPhone displays
      • Minor adjustments to `img` tag related items
      • Monster be gone!? – addressed special case many level menu in sidebar

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Updated `hooks-filter.txt` documentation to note eight (8) new filters
      • Updated `hooks-actions.txt` documentation to note two (2) new actions
      • Updated `screenshot.png` to show a bit more of the theme display

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2.4 ==

      • Released May 2014

      = Code =

      • Added sanity check to only display comments_link when not in single view or in an archive view
      • Added Featured Image Thumbnails to post-format single and archive view templates (except Post-Formats: Image and Gallery)
      • Added `opus_primus_theme_version()` call as an accessible text string
      • Added new default `number_of_secondary_images` method under Gallery parameters
      • Bring the Featured Image Thumbnail back into the index view … can you say “waffle”?
      • Change `$output = null` to `$output = ”` in `OpusPrimusPosts::sticky_flag` method
      • Corrected typo in `’opus_links_pages_after’` hook
      • Corrected modified date/time output to account for scheduled posts being modified earlier than they are posted
      • Refactored conditional comments and featured thumbnail checks into the `comments_link` and `show_featured_thumbnail` methods
      • Removed `extract` function, escaped attributes, and refactored conditional checks in PullQuotes Stanza
      • Use `opus_primus_theme_version` in place of `wp_get_theme` calls
      • Use transients to improve performance impact of the `OpusPrimusStructures::copyright` method

      = CSS =

      • Added Format-Aside Dashicons to Post-Format: Aside posts
      • Added Flag Dashicons to Sticky Posts
      • Changed Password Protected Dashicons to use the Lock
      • Separated the Tagline output class into two different classes
      • Updated normalize.css to 3.0.1 (copy and pasted from git.io/normalize)

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Added filter `opus_primus_theme_version_text`
      • Change text domain to match theme slug
      • Updated `hooks-actions.txt`
      • Updated `hooks-filters.txt` (corrected reference to `opus_first_author_details_text`)
      • Updated Opus Primus PullQuotes `readme.txt`

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2.3 ==

      • Released February 2014

      = Code =

      • Added more tests
      • Added Featured Image thumbnail to standard post-format archive views
      • Moved `featured_image` wrapper into OpusPrimusGallery::featured_image method
      • Moved `secondary_images` wrapper into OpusPrimusGallery::secondary_images method
      • Moved the ellipsis out of the read more link
      • Refactored `$output` to use `button` class versus the button element in meta byline flags
      • Removed unused parameter `$more` from `OpusPrimusPosts::excerpt_more_link` method
      • Removed `$sep_location` parameter as it was not used in `browser_title` method
      • Removed Featured Image thumbnail from index view
      • Renamed `OpusPrimusDefaults` methods from `show_*` to `display_*`
      • Set `display_page_byline` to true as theme author aesthetic choice

      = CSS =

      • Added post coda post format classes
      • Added `dashicons` dependency to main `Opus-Primus` stylesheet
      • Added `button` class to replace the button element styles
      • Change to only append to the `cite` tag when it is inside the `blockquote` tag
      • Center align Calendar Day table header cells
      • Fixed really long Post Titles and Words not wrapping as expected
      • General clean-up and removal of excess/over-writing properties
      • Prepended Post Byline with matching Post-Format dashicons
      • Re-Adjust `ul.nav-menu` and `.nav-menu` to `z-index: 3` for main menu
      • Reduced the citation font-size for better aesthetics

      = JavaScript =

      • Re-format code structures
      • Removed `table-stripe` class from specific Calendar elements

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Updated tags used in `style.css` header block to include responsive-layout and fluid-layout
      • Updated `readme.txt` to note existence and location of `changelog.txt`
      • Updated `readme.txt` copyright notice to clarify copyright years used by individual files.
      • Updated Required WordPress version to 3.8 for `dashicons` dependency

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2.2 ==

      • Released October 2013

      = Code =

      • Added conditional test rather than print both breadcrumbs (one empty)
      • Additional i18n code corrections and enhancements
      • Corrected i18n code for EXIF data
      • Extracted $post_title management from `post_breadcrumb` method into the `breadcrumb_post_title` method
      • Fixed issue with Gallery Post-Format being used when the `gallery` shortcode is not used.
      • Fixed undefined offset when there is no image found in post
      • Reformatted to be closer to (modified) WordPress Coding Standards – see https://gist.github.com/Cais/8023722

      = CSS =

      • Reduced all menu related elements with `z-index` property to a value of 1
      • Removed `z-index` property from breadcrumb related elements
      • Set the breadcrumbs background color to `#ffffff` (white)

      = Miscellaneous

      • Add documentation to the `first_linked_image` function
      • Removed `table-stripe` class from Post-Format: Image tables
      • Tested up to WordPress version 3.7

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2.1 ==

      • Released August 2013
      • Removed `translation-ready` tag

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.2 ==

      • Released August 2013

      = Code =

      • Added display of featured image centered at full size in single standard post format view
      • Added full `featured_image` method call to single view of post formats audio, chat, quote, and status
      • Added `get_author_description` method in Authors class
      • Added filtered `comment_form_required_field_glyph` method in Comments class
      • Added many new filters – see http://opusprimus.com/under-the-page/hooks-filters/ or `hooks-filters.txt` for a current list
      • Added sanity conditional check to eliminate potential duplicate body classes
      • Added `is_single` conditional test before enqueue of Comment Tabs script
      • Added post to post navigation in single view
      • Added conditional check if not post password required when displaying comments
      • Added conditional for showing the page byline details
      • Added `display_page_byline` default and set as false
      • Changed `the_post_thumbnail` to use parameters which are set in the call to `OpusPrimusImage::featured_image`
      • Changed post thumbnail on pages to full size image and align to the center
      • Changed comment fields into an unordered list
      • Changed `meta-tags` container from `p` to `div` (adjusted CSS as needed)
      • Changed `opus_post_byline_details` filter to `opus_post_byline_phrase`
      • Check for long post titles in breadcrumbs and trim as needed
      • Display comment count in meta details if comments exist and comments are closed
      • Fixed call to wrong post navigation function in single view
      • Merge `opus-ignite.php` into `functions.php`
      • Moved `featured_image` method call into `is_single` conditional in post-format loops
      • Removed `featured_image` method call from post-formats link and video loops
      • Removed global `$opus_image_meta`; replaced with call to `exif_data` method
      • Removed `style.less` related function and action calls
      • Removed `restore_image_title`

      = CSS =

      • Added styles for comment form fields
      • Added more specific selector used with `.post.format-link`
      • Added more BNS Plugin Integration (BPI) adjustments
      • Added styles from compiled `style.less` file (file removed)
      • Added `img` elements for captioned images and `wp-smiley` images
      • Address both class and id usage for the sidebar search form
      • Adjusted widths of comment form elements
      • Adjusted CSS to better handle large images with captions in large full-width displays
      • Adjusted `table` elements from `max-width: 100%` to `width: 100%` and other minor changes
      • Minor tweaks and adjustments
      • Sorted out the adaptive layout for screens less than 480px wide

      = JavaScript =

      • Added more specific selector used with `.post.format-link` when adding `.link-symbol` class
      • Added script to create class to display tables with striped rows
      • Removed LESS JavaScript library

      = Stanzas =

      • PullQuotes – Added `pullquotes-readme.txt` file
      • PullQuotes – Added left-side placement with new `to` parameter
      • Taglines – Added `taglines-readme.txt` file
      • THA – Added `tha-readme.txt` file

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Documentation Updates
      • Minor changes to text tense used in `changelog.txt`
      • Removed `style.less` file (compiled and merged into `opus-primus.css` file)
      • Removed license references related to LESS as all components were removed
      • Updated `hooks-actions.txt`
      • Updated `hooks-filters.txt`
      • Updated `readme.txt` FAQ – What is the difference between how the “Featured Image” is used on a post and how it is used on a page?
      • Updated `readme.txt` FAQ – What are Stanzas?
      • Updated `readme.txt` FAQ – What happened to the LESS components of the theme?

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.1.1 ==

      • Released March 2013

      = Code =

      • Added `all_comments_count` and `show_all_comments_count` methods to Comments class to be used in the ‘comments.php’ template when displaying total comments
      • General minor code refactorings and improvements
      • Moved `comments only tab`, `pingbacks only tab` and `trackbacks only tab` functionality into Comments class methods
      • Moved `comments only panel`, `pingbacks only panel` and `trackbacks only panel` functionality into Comments class methods

      = CSS =

      • Added rounded corners for the comment type tabs and the comments panel
      • Added `#d3d3d3` color as default tab background color; active is transparent
      • Removed unused element for non-existent ‘comments-toggle’ script

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Remove $content_width set values from Structures class method `layout_open` and set in ‘functions.php’
      • Updated ‘hooks-actions.txt’

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.1 ==

      • Released March 2013

      = Code =

      • Added `excerpt_more_link` and attached to `excerpt_more` filter
      • Added `anchor_title_text` for use with `excerpt_more_link` and permalink in the post meta details
      • Added additional list wrapper around each comment type
      • Added Breadcrumbs trails to pages and posts
      • Added Comment Tabs for each type (Comment, Pingback, and Trackback)
      • Created and enqueued ‘opus-primus-comment-tabs.js’
      • Created Header class
      • Dropped `restore_image_title` filter hook into `media_send_to_editor` as potentially blocking insertion of media
      • Fixed comments (only) count output
      • Limit width generated by “Full Size Video” JavaScript to a maximum of 1000px
      • Refactored Structures class to put `site_title`, `site_description`, and `custom_header_image` into Header class
      • Refactored `opus-primus-header` to reflect class/method changes of Structures and Header

      = CSS =

      • Added classes to `h2`, `ul`, and `li` elements in `OpusPrimusAuthors::author_details`
      • Add minor comments styles
      • Centered content of Post Format: Video posts.

      = Miscellaneous =

      • Removed unused style sheet ‘opus-primus-responsive-layout.css’

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.0.4 ==

      • Released March 2013

      = Code =

      • Added ‘Breadcrumbs’ class
      • Fixed problem with wrong loop method call in ‘archive.php’
      • Moved `breadcrumbs` method from ‘Structures’ class to ‘Breadcrumbs’ class
      • Removed `hgroup` container from ‘opus-primus-header’

      = CSS =

      • Added Breadcrumbs section
      • Code formatting

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.0.3 ==

      • Released February 2013

      = Code =

      • Changed the MetaBoxes class to TagLines
      • Moved TagLines into its own Stanza as another example of the theme extensibility
      • Added `breadcrumbs` method to Structures as a precursor to new features in version 1.1

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.0.2 ==

      • Released February 2013

      = Code =

      • Fixed ‘search’ template bug when a page is returned in the results

      = CSS =

      • Started “BNS Plugin Integrations” (aka BPI) – BNS Inline Asides

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.0.1 ==

      • Released February 2013

      = Code =

      • Added ‘opus_footer_after’ action hook
      • Change classes in ‘404.php’ from using underscores to using hyphens
      • Created new methods `the_loop_wrapped` and `the_loop_archives_wrapped`
      • Modified action hooks to more semantic naming convention: `opus_
      • Moved ‘opus_body_bottom’ action hook to immediately before closing body tag
      • Replaced `the_loop` method and surrounding code with `the_loop_wrapped`
      • Replaced `the_loop_archives` method and surrounding code with `the_loop_archives_wrapped`
      • Wrapped ‘opus_modified_post_after’ action hook in conditional making it consistent with ‘opus_modified_post_before’

      = CSS =

      • Centered top level menu items only – better aesthetics with short page titles
      • Added `clear: both;` to ‘img.aligncenter, img.center’ to address Firefox issue when when a Featured Image and a large in post image are too close together.
      • Added post coda post format classes
      • Fixed really long Post Titles and Words not wrapping as expected

      = Miscellaneous =

      /** ————————————————————————- */
      == Version 1.0 ==

      • Initial release – February 2013

      == Review Tickets ==


      I based the overall layout on the premises put forward in plugin readme files with a couple of optional items such as the expanded licenses section and a list of all past trac tickets for the theme.

      I’d be agreeable to adding a header section of sorts (along the lines of the OP example), obviously inserted before my “Copyright” section as noted in the readme contents area.

      Excuse the excessive length but linking to the file really doesn’t give the same impact of what a readme.txt file could look like after several versions if/when the changelog is added into it.

      • Daedalon 5:21 pm on May 6, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I’d be all for showcasing only a few items of each type in similar future comments, just as many as is enough to illustrate the approach, with the optional link to the full file for those who want to dive deeper.

    • Tammie 9:42 am on April 30, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      This is what we do at Automattic and to me feels the right format: https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/browser/resonar/1.0.3/readme.txt.

      A few points:

      • Tags are great to have in one place here too. It means you end up with one doc that has all the essential information. Easier to parse and easier for users.
      • The change I’d probably make is tested up to. I’d probably say supported.
      • Credits could be resources, I don’t mind what you call it.
    • Dion Hulse 12:55 am on May 4, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      I’d suggest dropping the ‘Tested Up to’ or ‘Supported’ fields, but retaining the ‘Requires’.

      My reasoning is:

      • Themes often keep working (and don’t become obsolete like plugins), there’s no good reason for a theme to break with a WP upgrade
      • Updating that metadata will require a new theme release, plugins can just make a quick unreviewed commit, themes are not that simple
      • The fields haven’t really been great in the plugin directory IMHO, Lots of things continue working, but people avoid them as the theme isn’t specifically marked as supported (or you get support requests every month asking “Does this work with 4.2? I don’t think it does because it’s not listed as such”
      • If a theme isn’t compatible with a new version of WordPress, or fatals/etc, it should be pulled from the listing, so “tested up to” should really be inferred as being the latest version

      I understand that many theme authors who release a new update every month and constantly update the theme to be up to date with WordPress’s features, would love a Tested field to make them stand out from the crowd, but it feels like it’ll just be at a detriment to other not-as-frequently-updated themes which are not necessarily of lesser quality and ultimately provide little benefit to an end-user.

      As for other comments about keeping the fields to major releases only, +1, but that kind of happens for plugins already, we have an internal list in the APIs that says “4.1 compatible means 4.1.1 & 4.1.2 too”, there’s never been a requirement nor need to update it to “Tested up to 4.1.2″ if you had it listed as 4.1.

      • Chip Bennett 7:32 pm on May 4, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        If a theme isn’t compatible with a new version of WordPress, or fatals/etc, it should be pulled from the listing, so “tested up to” should really be inferred as being the latest version

        How would Themes be “pulled from the listing” without some way of knowing that it isn’t compatible with the current version of core? The best we can hope to do, currently, is hide from the listing any Theme that hasn’t been updated in the past X period of time (currently two years, IIRC).

        The biggest roadblock, as you mentioned, is the need for a simple compat-verification documentation (e.g. “Tested up to” in the readme) to go through the entire review process – though updates for approved Themes happen almost immediately.

        Perhaps we need some mechanism for Theme developers to update readme.txt in the Theme repo directly?

        • Justin Tadlock 11:11 pm on May 4, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          One thing I’ve always wanted to see was a simple select box on the WordPress.org site itself for theme/plugin authors to say that something is compatible. The readme file is a poor way of handling this to me.

        • Dion Hulse 11:37 pm on May 4, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

          How would Themes be “pulled from the listing” without some way of knowing that it isn’t compatible with the current version of core?

          Having a readme line, checkbox, widget, or whatever that says “Hey, my theme is still compatible with WordPress” is silly, that was my whole point.
          Themes remain compatible with WordPress (although not always with the TRT guidelines) for long enough that having to proactively update something seems a waste of time for all involved.

          How often do you see a theme that is no longer compatible with WordPress? When that number becomes more than a handful a year, maybe we could consider a compatibility widget for themes (like we have for plugins)..

          Otherwise, I’d just prefer to see proactive removals when someone knows somethings wrong with it – “Hey this theme no longer works, can someone suspend it for me?” or “Hey, this theme isn’t compatible with 4.5, can someone suspend it until I’ve got time to fix it next month?”

          For reference – I already suspend themes from the directory when I see them start to cause fatals on wp-themes.com, the WordPress.org devs get notified about them – It’s rare, but there’s been a few recently that were from 2008. I always shoot the author a friendly email to let them know though.

          Perhaps we need some mechanism for Theme developers to update readme.txt in the Theme repo directly?

          I’d also say that’s not needed, if the tested-up-to version is the only thing that would require it.. it oughta just be dropped.

          • Chip Bennett 12:26 pm on May 5, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

            Having a readme line, checkbox, widget, or whatever that says “Hey, my theme is still compatible with WordPress” is silly, that was my whole point.

            You’re right. This is a pretty big “win” for the Themes directory, and we should recognize it as such. Sometimes I forget just how far we’ve come in just a few short years.

            The biggest potential issue is functions being newly deprecated in a new version of core – but even that will almost never cause breakage.

            I do think that Theme developers will complain (and rightly so, given the user perception that “recently updated” == “better”) if they are unable to highlight that they have tested/verified their Theme against the latest version of core. It is also seen as a sign of a Theme being actively updated/supported by the developer. So, I do think there’s some value in that information.

            I like Justin’s idea, though – provide some way for the developer to indicate core support in the Admin area of the Theme’s listing on the directory. A simple checkbox or dropdown select would probably suffice.

    • Emil Uzelac 8:24 pm on May 10, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      @jcastaneda just noticed == Resources == in your original post, while it should be == Credits == instead :)

    • Tomas Mackevicius 4:44 pm on May 19, 2015 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Is it possible to get validator like there is one for plugin readme:


compose new post
next post/next comment
previous post/previous comment
show/hide comments
go to top
go to login
show/hide help
shift + esc