Welcome to the official home of the WordPress Documentation Team.
This team is responsible for coordinating all documentation initiatives around WordPress, including the handbooks and other general wordsmithing across the WordPress project.
Want to get involved?
Start here to find out more about what we do and how to contribute:
Documentation Issue Tracker on GitHub: Submit any Documentation Team-related issues on GitHubGitHubGitHub is a website that offers online implementation of git repositories that can easily be shared, copied and modified by other developers. Public repositories are free to host, private repositories require a paid subscription. GitHub introduced the concept of the ‘pull request’ where code changes done in branches by contributors can be reviewed and discussed before being merged be the repository owner. https://github.com/
Weekly meetings
Join our discussions of documentation issues here on the blog and on Slack.
Requirements for a new design for the article pages in user documentation
This is post one on a four-part series. The focus on these series is the redesign of documentation that will include a new template, new categorization, new navigation and some renaming of articles. On this post, we will focus on requirements.
Some of these requirements are very straight forward, others still need a bit of discussion. The links to the PRs are included.
List of requirements:
Article voting (#7) vs feedback: contributions from the public (#240)
SidebarSidebarA sidebar in WordPress is referred to a widget-ready area used by WordPress themes to display information that is not a part of the main content. It is not always a vertical column on the side. It can be a horizontal rectangle below or above the content area, footer, header, or any where in the theme. navigation styling (#111)
CategoryCategoryThe 'category' taxonomy lets you group posts / content together that share a common bond. Categories are pre-defined and broad ranging. terms archive (#231)
1. Article voting (#7) vs feedback: contributions from the public (#240)
The difference between “article voting” and “feedback: contributions from the public” is the type of information we gather from the user.
Is knowing if an article is useful to a user, better than having the user’s feedback? Is there a way to merge both? Or do we want to keep them both and separate? Or would only one fulfill the documentation goals?
At the moment, there is a feedback form being tried out. The questions are: Was this article helpful? How could it be improved? The reply box is for a long comment and none of these replies/feedback is posted online.
Question is, being that the features require different information and some articles are already too long, do we need both features?
Article voting recommendation
No triggers a feedback box:
And the article will show the number of yes replies
Feedback: contributions from the public (the form that is being tested in WP.org at the moment this post was written)
Are there Rosetta sites that will not be using the HelpHub pluginPluginA plugin is a piece of software containing a group of functions that can be added to a WordPress website. They can extend functionality or add new features to your WordPress websites. WordPress plugins are written in the PHP programming language and integrate seamlessly with WordPress. These can be free in the WordPress.org Plugin Directory https://wordpress.org/plugins/ or can be cost-based plugin from a third-party to translate documentation? Is it still necessary to add the language feature?
Currently the view on mobile for documentation uses a very large band and it gives the impression that there is nothing else. So increase information above the fold.
Although the dev notes are written for developers, the docs team is interested in keeping an index page of all the dev notes written for a release. The index page will be linked from the release version page.