Meeting agenda here and the full chat log is available beginning here on Slack.
Focus group updates
- @adamsilverstein: The image team has been focused on addressing feedback on the WebP work and have prepped two follow up commits that address these concerns.
- https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-develop/pull/3161 reverts all of the multi-mime changes. Note for contributors to this work who might be disappointed to see it reverted: multi-mime work may return in a future release once we can land async media generation. Even though we aren’t gonna use the approach now, exploring it was important to arriving at the current approach with confidence.
- This has since been committed in .
- https://github.com/adamsilverstein/wordpress-develop-fork/pull/35/ introduces the WebP output mapping. It includes some new tests as well as fixing an existing bug A bug is an error or unexpected result. Performance improvements, code optimization, and are considered enhancements, not defects. After feature freeze, only bugs are dealt with, with regressions (adverse changes from the previous version) being the highest priority. and addressing possible generated file naming conflicts.
- This has since been committed in .
- @joegrainger: Working on Regenerate existing images GitHub GitHub is a website that offers online implementation of git repositories that can easily be shared, copied and modified by other developers. Public repositories are free to host, private repositories require a paid subscription. GitHub introduced the concept of the ‘pull request’ where code changes done in branches by contributors can be reviewed and discussed before being merged be the repository owner. https://github.com/ issues #479 and #480
- @mukesh27: Working on Core Core is the set of software required to run WordPress. The Core Development Team builds WordPress. Trac An open source project by Edgewall Software that serves as a bug tracker and project management tool for WordPress. tickets #16502, #55227, #37114
- @wpgurudev: Background job taxonomy PR has been merged; follow up PRs #507 and #512 are ready for review
- @flixos90: Reminder about the fetchpriority module which is still looking for an owner. This module was already approved for inclusion in the Performance Lab plugin A plugin is a piece of software containing a group of functions that can be added to a WordPress website. They can extend functionality or add new features to your WordPress websites. WordPress plugins are written in the PHP programming language and integrate seamlessly with WordPress. These can be free in the WordPress.org Plugin Directory https://wordpress.org/plugins/ or can be cost-based plugin from a third-party, and it’s a great opportunity to get started with owning a module – a “good first module” so to speak.
- @spacedmonkey: Committed 
- @flixos90: would be curious whether this network (versus site, blog) options API An API or Application Programming Interface is a software intermediary that allows programs to interact with each other and share data in limited, clearly defined ways. change has actual performance benefits. It’s certainly great from an API perspective to have that better aligned, but since we’re speaking about performance here, I don’t think we really know how that is going to be impacted
- @spacedmonkey: It reduces the number of queries a lot; it also means if a network option does not exist in the database, it does result in another query (with Jetpack installed, 3 less queries per page just from missed network options); To be sure, performance is not the only reason do this. It removed a lot of code and add benefits, like register_meta, default values, new filters etc.
- @flixos90: Totally makes sense. If you could support that with some benchmarks for the dev note Each important change in WordPress Core is documented in a developers note, (usually called dev note). Good dev notes generally include:
a description of the change;
the decision that led to this change
a description of how developers are supposed to work with that change.
Dev notes are published on Make/Core blog during the beta phase of WordPress release cycle. Publishing dev notes is particularly important when plugin/theme authors and WordPress developers need to be aware of those changes.In general, all dev notes are compiled into a Field Guide at the beginning of the release candidate phase. that would be great and also justify it more from a performance perspective
- @spacedmonkey: Core PRs #3178 and #2995 are ready for review
- We’re seeking 1-2 POCs for this group; if you’re interested, please comment here or ping The act of sending a very small amount of data to an end point. Ping is used in computer science to illicit a response from a target server to test it’s connection. Ping is also a term used by Slack users to @ someone or send them a direct message (DM). Users might say something along the lines of “Ping me when the meeting starts.” in Slack Slack is a Collaborative Group Chat Platform https://slack.com/. The WordPress community has its own Slack Channel at https://make.wordpress.org/chat/.
- @flixos90: Site Health check for full page cache was merged last week in 
- There were some follow up quirks to address with some test issues related to some environment edge cases, but those have all been addressed shortly after (see #56041 for more details)
- We’re seeking 1-2 POCs for this group; if you’re interested, please comment here or ping in Slack
- @mehulkaklotar: working on proposal for Plugin Check plugin, getting ready for reviews from the team
- @flixos90: Plugin PRs #388 and #510 were completed last week, which are some great little fixes
- @pbearne: Dominant Color proposal feedback discussion and next steps
- @pbearne: The feeling is that this is good idea and we would want it, but the theme should control turning it on; the code to store the dominant color values on image upload into the image meta Meta is a term that refers to the inside workings of a group. For us, this is the team that works on internal WordPress sites like WordCamp Central and Make WordPress. should run regardless (e.g. that data could also be used in the media library in core)
- We would hide the dominant color for the front-end behind a theme support flag like
add_theme_support( 'dominant-color' );
- This approach can be seen in core PR #3164
- @flixos90: I think it makes sense to have the CSS Cascading Style Sheets. aspect of it controlled by themes. However there is considerable other feedback on the post which focuses on the performance aspect of this feature
- @flixos90: IMO we should center the conversation around that first, as there was some concern on the post what the real performance impact is (whether it’s perceived or “actual” performance); FWIW I don’t think the single lab test that was conducted and posted on the GitHub issue serves as a meaningful indicator for performance. PageSpeed Insights lab test results vary greatly, even between runs of the same page, so the fact that it was slightly better in one run doesn’t mean anything – which is a shame really, but that’s the case
- @spacedmonkey: I am not sure I agree with your judgement on this one
- @flixos90: We would need to do much larger scale tests across a variety of sites to assess a performance impact. Metrics like bytes throughput, database queries etc. are stable, but for things like CWV they vary greatly between each run; If you run let’s say 10 tests, each time before, the other time after, and it’s consistently better with the feature, then there may be something to it. But a single PSI test doesn’t mean anything in terms of CWV and dynamic metrics like FCP, TTFB etc., that’s unfortunately the truth
- @spacedmonkey: But this change has never been about actual performance improvements, perceived performance was always the goal. Could you spend sometime profiling performance further for us and see what results you get?
- A follow up analysis with more sample data sets has since been conducted, indicating there is no clear performance impact from the feature, so we probably need to focus on perceived performance indeed
- @adamsilverstein: the discussion on the ticket Created for both bug reports and feature development on the bug tracker. centers around perceived performance: based on the approach, I doubt there is much actual performance benefit as measured in the lab. Maybe one thing that is missing from the proposal or the comment thread replies is research/data around the benefits background color provides for perceived load time. Part of the issue may be a lack of prior research?
- @adamsilverstein: the original idea was a bit different (low quality image placeholders, not dominant color) and had even more tradeoffs/cost to use. the commonality is they help users have a sense of what is going to fill an image space before the image loads
- @flixos90: I think that’s what is a potential problem here: Most articles that we’ve dug up so far focus on perceived performance of regular images with LQIP. But what we’re doing now is “less” than LQIP, so it’s further away from looking like the final image. I know there were technical complexities that make us chose that path, but I think we need to consider that
- @spacedmonkey: Dominate color has other benefits and can also be used in styling, contrasting overlays / text for example
- @adamsilverstein: lack of existing research may be because dominant color is relatively unique/new approach? were there existing examples of it we looked at? maybe we need to conduct some research?
- @spacedmonkey: Unsplash uses blurhash and fallback to dominant color, Google Images also uses dominant color
- @masteradhoc: I feel like the way that Google uses it for images is really a good way and can improve the visible speed for the user. I would support to have this into core. Frontend is controlled by themes and wp-admin (and super admin) by default looks quite a good way for me
- @pbearne: Do we feel that adding dominant color to the media library what a good improvement in itself (e.g. as an improvement to wp-admin)?
- @adamsilverstein: might be worth bringing up at a media meeting, I like the idea but have some concerns: how would library look with only some images having dominant color generated? is it worth the effort of generating the color on upload only for the media library?
- @flixos90: a potential concern is that this runs additional processing on image upload. I don’t know how much it impacts upload, and whether it does increase the chance to time out or run into memory limit, but that is quite sensitive. Especially at this point as we are just going to revert the multi MIME image generation for exactly that reason; I think starting with the media library may be a good approach if this additional processing is not a concern
- @pbearne: it’s actually quite lite on upload compared to the rest of processing
Our next chat will be held on Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 15:00 UTC in the #core-performance channel in Slack.