Dev Chat Summary: May 30th (4.9.7 week 2)

This post summarizes the dev chat meeting from May 30th (agenda, Slack archive).

4.9.7 planning

  • No pressing need for quick 4.9.7 release, so aiming for ~6-8 week release cycle for 4.9.7
  • Leads nominated so far: @sergeybiryukov able to help as deputy (e.g., committing, backporting); @danieltj, @desrosj, and @tristangemus open to help contribute during 4.9.7
  • Please comment on this post, ping @jeffpaul, or comment during the next dev chat for nominations (self or otherwise) for release leads on 4.9.7

Updates from focus leads and component maintainers

  • The PHP team posted a summary from their meeting last week covering the “Upgrade PHP” page and possible Gutenberg blocks. Please join them this coming Monday, June 4th at 15:00 UTC in #core-php
  • The GDPR Compliance team met earlier today and of note will be changing the Slack channel and post tags to Core Privacy this Friday, June 1st. Please join them next Wednesday, June 6th at 15:00 UTC in #core-privacy

Guidelines for fixing coding standard violations

  • Now that r42343 has landed, Core is accepting patches to fix coding standards (CS) violations. The meeting attendees agreed on the following guidelines:
    • Patches for any CS fixes are welcome, as long as they’re not so extensive that it would require refreshing an unreasonable amount of regular patches.
    • In order to avoid wasting time, patches for violations which cannot be automatically fixed by `phpcbf` should be given preference over ones that can be automatically fixed.
    • Regardless of many files are touched in a CS patch, the corresponding commits should be limited to fixing a single file in each commit.
    • CS patches should be treated just like any other patch, and reviewed critically before being committed. That also applies to any changes made by `phpcbf`.
    • Commits for new features, bug fixes, and other “logic” changes should not include unrelated CS fixes. Coding standards fixes should be done in a separate commit. If a line is already being changed to fix a bug, etc, then it should have CS violations fixed at the same time. If fixing the violation for that line would introduce changes beyond that line, though, then the CS fixes should be done in a separate commit.
  • Does anyone strongly object to those, before they’re added to Handbook?

General announcements

Next meeting

The next meeting will take place on June 6, 2018 at 20:00 UTC / June 6, 2018 at 20:00 UTC in the #core Slack channel. Please feel free to drop in with any updates or questions. If you have items to discuss but cannot make the meeting, please leave a comment on this post so that we can take them into account.

#4-9-7, #core, #core-php, #core-privacy, #dev-chat, #gdpr-compliance, #summary, #wpcs