4.3 Retrospective Results
I missed posting the 4.3 post mortem recap before I went on vacation, so without further ado:
We discussed the 4.3 release in Slack, where I asked for things that should be improved and things that went well, in order to get some feedback on how I did and helpful tips for future release leads (please find the Slack log here):
Should be improved:
- Figure out some ways to get more testing and more eyes on betas and RCs.
- Not having feature plugin complete (with core patch) before the merge window.
- The menu customizer proposal could have been written differently in anticipation of community perception.
- The people who are able to test term splitting properly are very limited. Not sure how to wrangle people for this kind of specialized testing.
- there seemed to be a lack of movement at the end of the cycle.
- Features like site icon should be done as a feature plugin.
- The merge proposal could have been proof-read by someone from the core team.
- Getting dev-notes written up earlier.
- There were also not a lot of feature plugins ready for core at the start of 4.3.
- Don’t think it’s really okay to be relaxing standards in the name of forcing something to fit a deadline.
- We did a freeze/RC maaaaybe 24 hours before release that had significant changes in it, that did not feel good.
- We completely changed features after beta 1.
- I think in 4.2 we discovered that have a core mentor involved much earlier also helped get it to that “ready” place. Or closer to ready.
- Find a way to increase participation for bug scrubs.
- passwords went really well.
- We had a solid crop of guest committers that really made things go well for there project area.
- Update to 4.3 went really smoothly over all as well.
- We had some epic traction on Formatting component patches during this cycle. I’m a bit surprised how many tickets we closed with 4.3 because those are usually very problematic.
- Touch and small screen usability improved significantly. Two of my top five issues were fixed outright and progress was made on a third.
- I demoed the keyboard shortcuts in the editor to some people and they were like “DAMN, that’s amazing”.
- i’m really happy about list table changes!
- Shared taxonomy terms are dead.
- WE RELEASED ON TIME!!!!
I’m probably a little biased, but contrary to what the amount of bullet points in each section might suggest, I agree with @samuelsidler who said: “Almost everything went really smooth.” I’m proud of what we accomplished, and the download and update numbers speak for themselves. Thank you again for everyone who helped out during the release, let’s make 4.4 even better!