We’ve been hammered with spam on the Dutch forum lately and that has resulted in a not so flattering tag cloud http://i.remk.us//ej/vzrof9qfscgkc.png
Recounting via the bbPress tool results in a internal server (500) error. Please advise sir @nacin 
Updates from Remkus de Vries Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
-
Remkus de Vries
-
Remkus de Vries
Hey @vanillalounge ,
Can you please deploy Rosetta Forum to the Dutch forums please? I know it’s not finished yet, but we’re working on that.
Thanks!
-
Ze Fontainhas
-
Remkus de Vries
Thanks! It is tagged with Request though.
-
-
Remkus de Vries
This is where GlotPress keeps weirding me out: http://cl.ly/0520243U2f0Q021B2006 Every single view shows there a no strings left to translate, but yet it keeps nagging me about 5 untranslated strings. Is this a cache issue or a bug @nacin?
-
Remkus de Vries
We are finishing up the Dutch translation for Jetpack – finally – but we have one request. Currently an empty
jetpack-nl.pois added to the download where this should bejetpack-nl_NL.poIs there something I can do to have this changed properly or …
-
Andrew Nacin
Sent a note to @beau.
-
Remkus de Vries
on twitter?
-
Beau Lebens
on Skype
-
Remkus de Vries
don’t have you on skype yet Beau
-
Zé
Run, Beau!
-
Remkus de Vries
Hmm … So that’s going to be fun in January ..
-
-
Remkus de Vries
Just added you Beau..
-
-
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
I noticed today that upgrading TwentyTen and TwentyEleven to their 1.3 version make said themes loose their translations if they previously had some. Any idea who to talk to about this and / or where. Perhaps you know @nacin ?
-
Mark Thomas Gazel
Yeah, it’s a flaw I’ve experienced too. Also with earlier upgrades of the default themes.
-
Andrew Nacin
Yeah, we hosed you on this one. In 3.4 this will absolutely be handled.
-
Remkus de Vries
Is it an option to add the current available locales to a 1.3.1 version?
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
Is there a way, other than asking here, to update the po/mo on the nl.wordpress.org site to the latest 3.3 version? I want to make a new screenshot but it looks rather silly with New in the toolbar instead of Nieuw
-
Zé
The screenshot is updated on the site itself, mijnheer. Goto to Appearance → Header and upload the appropriately dimensioned image. As to the translation of rosetta itself, make sure it’s complete on GlotPress and then request a deploy from Tools → Deploy Requests
-
Remkus de Vries
Screenshot I knew, but I had not completed the Rosetta translation. Just finished that and requested a deploy.
-
Zé
Saw it, deployed. Give it 5 minutes to propagate.
-
Remkus de Vries
It’s been 20 minutes and it doesn’t seem to be updated. Wait longer or… ?
-
Zé
Example?
-
Remkus de Vries
http://cl.ly/CZ3I and http://cl.ly/CZCH for example..
-
Zé
Problem with the rosetta.pot. Looking.
-
Remkus de Vries
Still?
-
Zé
keep calm & carry on
-
Remkus de Vries
alrighty then
-
-
-
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
Oy,
How can we have the translations updated on our xx.wordpress.org sites? I’d love to see the fruits of my labor in fy.wordpress.org and nl.wordpress.org. As long as we don’t have any language packs just yet, the only thing I can do is bug you @vanillalounge ?
-
Zé
By ‘translations’ I assume you mean a fresh rosetta.pot? If so, I’m on it.
-
Remkus de Vries
I actually meant the actual translation in Dutch and Frisian I see when I am logged into those websites.
-
Zé
Right, rosetta.pot, as per http://codex.wordpress.org/International_WordPress_Sites
-
Remkus de Vries
I somehow always think of the extra stuff – like the deploy stuff – on the international sites as the rosetta.pot. Not the actual translations we create in GlotPress .. but hey, if that’s what you mean, go for it
-
Zé
rosetta.pot is a superset of WordPress, i.e. it’s WordPress (duh) with a few additional features, like deploy requests and the packaging and releasing of downloadable versions.
-
Remkus de Vries
Gotcha, thanks Zé!
-
-
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
When I look at the current NL Credits page I see myself and four other people as with Gravatar above ‘rest of the translators’. I assume that’s because somehow those usernames have validators or something, but none of them are (anymore). So please @vanillalounge please remove usernames edde, grizzler, mklijmij and basszje from the validator list and add afoka and rubenw to that list.
I’m the only one that is on that list and supposed to be. Could also because of something @nacin did not panning out perfectly though. Either way, the four mentioned above should be removed regardless.
-
Andrew Nacin
Everyone you mention are validators in the system. Validators should be 100% accurate with the system, as they’re easy to query. The other translators, not as much — that query might need work.
-
Remkus de Vries
Odd.. because rubenw and afoka or not being displayed as validators and to my knowledge edde, grizzler and basszje have never been. mklijmij has been one three years ago (pre GlotPress that is ).
-
Andrew Nacin
user basszje can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user afoka can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user rubenw can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user DeFries can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user edde can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user mklijmij can approve strings with locale nl and slug default
user grizzler can approve strings with locale nl and slug default-
Remkus de Vries
well.. all I can say is that the four mentioned before should be removed, and afoka and rubenw are not currently being shown on the credits page.
-
Remkus de Vries
Screenshot: http://cl.ly/7RzN
-
-
Zé
edde, grizzler, mklijmij and basszje can no longer validate, but afoka and rubenw were there all along.
-
Andrew Nacin
OK – bug confirmed on my end. Validators used to be stored a completely different way, I was pulling from that list. Need some time to switch it over.
-
Remkus de Vries
Glad you found the cause. And thanks BTW for the addition of the validators. Greatly appreciated by a lot of Validators I can asure you.
-
Remkus de Vries
One related but off topic about the profile link provided. The profile currently does not show any activity on the international forums. Is that something that can be fixed?
-
Zé
+1
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
Thanks Zé.
-
Remkus de Vries
Would you please add: defries, afoka and rubenwoudsma ( or rubenw, I’m not sure ) to the bbPress GlotPress project.
-
Zé
nl?
-
Remkus de Vries
nl_NL, yes.
-
Zé
Done (and it’s ‘rubenw’)
-
Remkus de Vries
Best. Drumming. Ever.
Thanks!
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
I’m guessing that with the release of the bbPress 2.0 beta plugin the translation will soon be added to translate.wordpress.org?
-
Rami
+1
-
Zé
http://translate.wordpress.org/projects/bbpress/plugin/
** Please use a separate thread to request new locales/validators ***
-
Remkus de Vries
Thanks Zé. Will do.
-
Remkus de Vries
We talked earlier about updating the xx.wordpress.org sites to a more current WordPress version and a new theme. We were told that we needed to wait ’till 3.1 dropped and this is me checking in again
Anynews on this?
-
Andrew Nacin
I’ll add it to my list and I’ll discuss it with Zé. Hopefully soon.
-
Remkus de Vries
Great, thanks!
-
Remkus de Vries
When I build a the new 3.1.1 version now and choose the following in Rosetta:
Locale branch: Tags/ 3.1.1
Project 3.1 and 3.1.x
WordPress Revision: HEAD
WordPress version: 3.1.1
I end up with a 3.1.2-alpha version which obviously is not what I should be getting. Is there a way to select to get the 3.1.1 tag from SVN?
-
herzcthu
I used WP revision number 17609 and it is OK. But Emre said 17595 to use. So change your revision to 17609 or 17595.
-
Remkus de Vries
That did the trick. Was not aware we could choose the version in that manner. I had tried to enter revision numbers there before but I always got an error. Works now, so thanks!
-
Emre Erkan
You can always check tags for revision numbers: http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tags
It’s the safest way to make things right for now.
-
-
Ran Yaniv Hartstein
3.1.1 was tagged in 17595 – so this is the version number to use.
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/17595
I had the same issue with he_IL – with project 3.1 and 3.1x and revision HEAD gives me “3.1.2-alpha” as version. Releasing like this, even if you override the version number manually (enter 3.1.1) under version) would still release witg 3.1.2-alpha in version.php, and would show a bleeding update notice to all users.
Setting the revision to 17595 seems to solve this issue.
-
Remkus de Vries
Hi there,
If you want to build a proper 3.1 version now, there’s no way of doing so via GlotPress, at least not that I am aware of. Is it perhaps now time to create a 3.1 tag there instead of using the development tag (which is already at 3.2 bleeding alpha..) ?
-
Mark Thomas Gazel
I’m not aware of a way of doing it building from GlotPress either. Always use svn. Especially for 3.1 since the dist-files had a few changes.
Would love to build from GlotPress. Especially for the security-releases, since I would love an easy way to get around them plus there’s never (?) changes in the dist-files in those releases.
-
Gabriel Reguly
We have built the Brazilian Portuguese 3.1 using GlotPress.
One should use the Revision 17487, and the development tag.
The revision would get the correct code, and the development tag would get the strings.
(Most likely it will get some strings form 3.2, if already present, so having a 3.1 tag for strings would be a good thing.)
Please see an image here: http://gabriel.ppgr.com.br/wordpress/building-wordpress-3-1-package-from-glotpress/
-
Zé
I’m not sure if there might be a confusion or not: no 3.1 shows up on the first dropdown because it pulls those values from the repository. Hence, if no branches/3.1 or tags/3.1 exist, no 3.1. Those folders are *not* created automatically, translators with svn permissions must create and populate them themselves. Is this the problem?
-
Remkus de Vries
No, it’s not that we can’t select the proper tag or branch, because yes, we can fix that ourselves, but that we can’t select a 3.1 translation from GlotPress. Only development and the old 3.0.x translatations. When I do select development it will actually create a 3.2 bleeding alpha with the translations from the development segment of GlotPress.. Hope this makes it more clear.
-
Zé
Got it. There’ll be a “Development (future 3.2)” very soon in GP and 3.1 will move to stable.
-
Remkus de Vries
Awesome, thanks!
-
-
-
-
Nikolay Bachiyski
I created the GlotPress projects and now the 3.0.x project shows up in the package builder. Enjoy
-
Zé
You mean 3.1.x ?
-
-
Gabriel Reguly
Yep, Nikolay meant Project: 3.1 and 3.1.x.
Remkus de Vries
Hi guys,
Could you please add jekrikken as a validator for the Dutch BuddyPress translation?
-
Zé
We can.
-
Remkus de Vries
There’s just no limit to your awesomeness, is there?
Thanks!
-
Zé
There isn’t.
-
-
Remkus de Vries
I am so lucky to have met you IRL then
-
Zé
You are
-
Remkus de Vries
We are getting hammered with spam on the Dutch forum the last couple of days, is there something someone can do about it? Not sure if this is the best place to ask for help, but please point me in the right direction
-
Zé
I’m afraid you’ll have to keep spam/bozo/blocking them until either Akismet or they learn…
-
jiehanzheng
LOL… zh_CN also needs your help, but not on spam! http://wppolyglots.wordpress.com/2010/12/02/hi-there-i-think-i-need-more-privilege/#comment-1196
Thanks.
-
Remkus de Vries
if that’s what it is, than that’s what we’ll do. What is the best solution, just deleting, blocking them of bozo?
-
Ruben Woudsma
How do others handle this? Currently I use the solution to ‘delete’, should we also block them or make the bozo’s?
-
Remkus de Vries
block, bozo and delete them. In that sequence.
-
-
-
Remkus de Vries
I *really* hope Akismet is learning FAST, because them spammers are not :/
-
Done. (tag it “request” next time, so that I get an immediate alert)